BMI

Our patients are counseled in details about the pros and cons of various bariatric procedures, especially the one they are going in for. In today’s practice, most of our patients tend to favor the Sleeve Gastrectomy for its safety, ease of maintenance and less restrictive lifestyle. It also may be cheaper than the bypass to variable extent.

We as surgeons tend to counsel patients according to our own perspectives. I have never failed to acknowledge that, while I can place in a Band as well as another Johnnie, I have a distinct distaste for it. My counseling tends to betray this bias. I am objective enough to acknowledge this, while many others would put an evidence-based spin to their own colored viewpoint.

So our pre-op counseling tends to favor the sleeve. I do try to attract the patient to the benefits of the bypass, but I am careful when doing so. An inappropriate procedure in an unsuited patient can be a miserable experience. As I was saying before interrupting myself for the nth time, we tend to portray the sleeve as the safest procedure for the patient, with very negligible leaks and problems like bleeding. We tend to convey the impression that the expected complications are more likely to be those of any procedure in the severely obese patient, like embolism, pneumonia, infections, etc.

Now, if I can be brutally frank about this, we are not being entirely factual. Why? Because even an operation as safe as sleeve gastrectomy does have a specific leak rate in the literature. How much? If you look at a recent prospective study from the famous Chilean University Hospital known for the great surgeon Atilla Csendes, they had seven leaks in 214 patients, around 3 percent. This is higher than other papers like this one from Cleveland Clinic, where the leak rate was 0.7 percent. However, on the whole, a figure of 2.7 percent is an accepted leak rate arrived at from 24 studies covering over 1700 patients. To our surprise, we find that the leak rate of the sleeve may be more than after the bypass, an operation generally acknowledged as having more complication rates (Nguyen et al).

There are several major issues of import here:

Are the leaks stapler related?

Are these leaks reduced by staple line reinforcement methods like suturing or Seamguard?

Can we identify a subset of patients who are more susceptible to leaks?

How do we manage these leaks?

For all these and more, stay tuned for Part Two.